Sister Site

Given our site’s stunning success, I propose that we find other sites whose content complements ours. This way, our sister site can refer to interesting articles we post, and we can do the same for them. More readers, better content…etc.


I propose we ask the author of this post to be that site:

Look, if you people want to use me as an easy target, go ahead. I can take it. But if NObama wins this election, don’t come crying to me when your taxes skyrocket, your breakfast cereal comes laced with anthrax and your kid’s elementary school starts teaching in Spanish.

John McCain represents the REAL America. He’s not running for President of San Francisco. For every hater on this site, there is someone who understands that the world has changed and we must change with it. Anyone who thinks we can apply the failed policies of the 1960’s (or, for that matter, France) and compete with the New Chinese Majority is in for a rude awakening.

So go ahead and hate. It’s easy to hate something you don’t understand.

That’s what liberals do.


They’ll love us.


3 responses to “Sister Site

  1. You have got to be kidding. I’ve spent 5 minutes here, and already I’ve read vicious smears on Rush Limbaugh AND Jerome Corsi. Great Americans both. Let the elephant pitch instead of catch, then we’ll talk.

  2. polisciafterparty

    Smears? Usually a smear involves a falsehood. Are we critical? Yes. Are we telling the truth? Yep. I don’t see how you can defend Mr. Corsi. He is a career liar. His new book is indefensible- and criticizing it is like shooting fish in a barrel. He makes it so easy with his blatant (BLATANT) falsehoods that it’s almost not worth addressing. Which factual inaccuracies do you believe to have been wrongly criticized?

    – Legal Eagle

  3. I reread the posts about Rush Limbaugh and Jerome Corsi, looking for the “vicious smears” mentioned above.

    Maybe someone can point out to me a single thing that was said about either gentlemen that compares with
    predicting one’s breakfast cereal will come “laced with anthrax” if Obama gets elected.

    Now, that was a vicious smear. Frankly, it would be impossible to describe it more accurately without using scatalogical terms.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s